Honesty over hype

实证 —— 诚实的 EA 厂商手册

大多数 EA 卖家只给你看一条绿色曲线,希望你别追问其余。我们反其道而行:每个 EA 都链接到它的真实回测——包括那些没通过的。

Live

实盘记录 —— 接入中

我们正在接入一个真实、有资金的账户,并开启只读公开统计(Myfxbook 或 MQL5 Signals)。在实盘上线前,本站所有数据均来自可复现的回测——绝不伪造资金曲线。一旦只读数据接入,本区块即刻显示。

在每个产品页你都能核实的内容

  • A real Exness 2020–2024 backtest (5 years of tick/history), not a 3-month cherry-pick.
  • The actual profit factor, net profit, max drawdown and trade count — the numbers that survive scrutiny.
  • EAs that did not pass are shown as blocked / not backtested, with the reason — not deleted.
  • No "guaranteed" language. No fabricated live accounts. Every claim is tied to a reproducible test.

Browse the lineup and open any EA to see its dashboard: EA Store →

为什么我们也展示失败的

A vendor who only shows winners is selling a filter, not a strategy. The four multi-symbol EAs currently marked "not backtested" are blocked by the trial account's limited symbol access, not by bad code — and we say so plainly. The ~20 lower-performing EAs are listed honestly with their real numbers so you can decide with eyes open. That is the difference between marketing and engineering.

真实买家案例(仅经授权)

We publish verified, buyer-authorized results only. No anonymous screenshots, no "a friend made 400%". Each case study is published only after the buyer signs off in writing and we can tie it to a real license. This section populates as customers opt in — it stays empty rather than filled with unverifiable claims.

Consent we require before publishing: the buyer's written permission, the EA + license key (to confirm entitlement), the broker/account type, the review period, and a statement that past performance is not a forecast. We redact personally identifying detail unless explicitly approved.

Running an EAbase EA and willing to share verified results? Contact us →

Trading involves substantial risk. Backtests are historical simulations and do not predict live results. Nothing here is financial advice.