Proof — the honest EA vendor playbook

What you can verify on every product page

• A real Exness 2020–2024 backtest (5 years of tick/history), not a 3-month cherry-pick.
• The actual profit factor, net profit, max drawdown and trade count — the numbers that survive scrutiny.
• EAs that did not pass are shown as blocked / not backtested, with the reason — not deleted.
• No "guaranteed" language. No fabricated live accounts. Every claim is tied to a reproducible test.

Browse the lineup and open any EA to see its dashboard: EA Store →

Why we show the failed ones too

A vendor who only shows winners is selling a filter, not a strategy. The four multi-symbol EAs currently marked "not backtested" are blocked by the trial account's limited symbol access, not by bad code — and we say so plainly. The ~20 lower-performing EAs are listed honestly with their real numbers so you can decide with eyes open. That is the difference between marketing and engineering.

Real buyer case studies (authorized only)

We publish verified, buyer-authorized results only. No anonymous screenshots, no "a friend made 400%". Each case study is published only after the buyer signs off in writing and we can tie it to a real license. This section populates as customers opt in — it stays empty rather than filled with unverifiable claims.

Consent we require before publishing: the buyer's written permission, the EA + license key (to confirm entitlement), the broker/account type, the review period, and a statement that past performance is not a forecast. We redact personally identifying detail unless explicitly approved.

Running an EAbase EA and willing to share verified results? Contact us →